skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Showing posts with label
harassment of transgender people.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
harassment of transgender people.
Show all posts
The other day I got into an argument with someone who watches Faux, I mean Fox, News for hours on end and echoes their whines about "the liberal media." Now, I'm no fan of Hilary or Obama, but I don't think the "liberal media" has gone easier on them than it did on George W. Bush or Dick Cheyney. After all, the so-called LM allowed them to get away with leading this country into two wars over lies and allowing the CEOs of large banks to, in essence, drive the world's economy off a cliff.
Also, the so-called liberal media is not all fawning over Caitlyn Jenner, as the Faux Folks might have you believe. One of Faux's compatriots in duplicity, Breibart News, engages in all sorts of thuggism so that it and its reporters can complain about being "victims" of the LM.
It started when Breitbart Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro made a point of insulting the trans community by refusing to refer to Caitlyn Jenner by her preferred pronoun. Then he deliberately provoked transwoman Zoey Tur by asking her, "What are your genetics, sir?"
Tur responded by placing her hand on his shoulder and saying, "You should cut that out now, or you'll go home in an ambulance." Shapiro claims that after the show, Tur said the two should meet in a parking lot. From there followed a stream of tweets between Shapiro, Tur and their followers that led to Shapiro making the ludicrous assertion that Tur is an anti-Semite.
All of this ended with Shapiro filing battery charges against Tur.
From what I know about the incident, Tur was wrong to threaten Shapiro. However, he and is fans conveniently ignore his complicity in creating the hostile environment in which she made the threat. And he is perpetuating such an environment by re-tweeting all of those who sent him approving tweets.
If anything, the fact that he was allowed to insult a trans woman on national TV for ten minutes before Tur threatened him should put lie his and his ilk's notions about the "liberal media" or about themselves as "victims."
So what is life like for a
black trans woman?
The sad tale of Meagan
Taylor might tell us more--and worse--than most people could have imagined.
She checked into a Des
Moines, Iowa hotel room with a friend who is also transgendered. The staff were
"acting really funny" around them, she said. Then the police
showed up at their hotel room.
Now she's sitting in a cell
of the Polk County Jail Medical Unit while officials try to figure out what to
do with her. Her bond is set at $2000. Were she a Polk County
resident, she could pay a tenth of that. But, being from out-of-state,
she would need someone local to co-sign, and she doesn't know a soul in
Iowa. She doesn't even have a lawyer. All of this means that Taylor
could be in that cell for months.
So what, exactly, is Meagan
charged with? Well, the hotel clerk who called the cops described
"two males dressed as females", with the implication that they were
prostitutes. The cops could find no evidence of that. They did,
however, find a bottle of spironolactone hydrochloride. in an unmarked
bottle in her purse. I used to take that same drug with estrogen tablets
before U had my surgery but, apparently, the cops didn't believe her when she
told them it's part of her hormone therapy. So, she was charged with
having a prescription drug without a prescription.
And, to be fair, she did
give a false name and Missouri ID. It’s
not clear as to how she got that ID, but it’s hard to understand why that
should have led to a charge of “malicious prosecution”, an aggravated
misdemeanor.
While arresting her, a
police officer ran a check and found she had an outstanding probation violation
in her home state of Illinois: When she was 17, she was charged with credit
card fraud. She says she did her time for that but admits she still owes $500
in fines.
All right. You might say that Meagan Taylor is no
angel. But who among us is? And young trans people often do, out of
desperation, the sorts of things (like credit card fraud and using fake IDs)
other young people do out of stupidity or arrogance.
I don’t think most people
would want to keep any young person locked up for such offenses. Incarcerating such people rarely does them
any good and costs a lot of money. So
why do Polk County officials see fit to keep Meagan Taylor, a low-level
nonviolent offender, behind bars?
This is for anyone who thinks that our pleas for equality are demands for "special treatment":

I think that, by now, most people would agree that it's wrong to "out" an LGBT person who is harming no one else.
But how do you discourage kids from bullying a trans classmate--or encourage those same kids' parents to be good examples of tolerance and honesty for their kids--without "outing" the classmate in question?
That's a question a school district in Missouri had to answer when someone who was born a boy was returning to school as a girl. School and district officials said they were interested in ensuring the child's safety and ability to learn.
Officials in Raytown sent a letter to parents informing them about the transgender child. Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), schools are not allowed to release most information about a child without the consent of the child's parents. Exempt from this ban are "directory" information, such as a student's name, address, phone number and date of birth, which can be released without consent. However, the school or district must provide ample warning of the release to allow the parent(s) enough time to request that the information not be released.
However, as you can imagine, there's "gray area" in the law. While a student's name may fall under the category of "directory" information, it's not clear whether the student's gender--which, some would argue, is part of a student's medical history--also falls into that category.
Whether or not "outing" the student was legal, let alone ethical, the fact remains that the student was outed. What will be the result? Will the release of information help to prevent her from being bullied, as school and district officials claim. Or will it make her more vulnerable, not only to bullying and other kinds of harassment, but also to other kinds of exploitation?
As I have mentioned in earlier posts, I had to go to my local precinct--the 114th in Astoria, Queens, New York--three times before they would even take a complaint from me regarding the harassment and bullying I experienced from Dominick.
Simply being brushed off, as I was the first time, was bad enough. But the second time nearly pushed me over the edge: two out-of-uniform officers harassed me on their way out of the gym, after a workout. They made air-smooches, asked me (in a mocking yet menacing way) whether I wanted to "take a ride" with them and, finally, threatened me if I didn't respond to them. The desk sergeant sat only a few feet away and watched it unfold but claimed to see nothing. Then, as I was unlocking my bike from a parking meter on the next block from the station, two officers barged in front of me.
"You're not supposed to park there!," one of them bellowed. "This spot's only for officers."
"I'm sorry, I didn't see a sign..."
"Just shut up and go, " the other one yelled. "And if you know what's good for you, you won't come back."
As it was dark and everything happened so quickly, I didn't see the officers badges--or, indeed, whether they were not wearing them or had covered the numbers on them. The cops who harassed me on their way out of the precinct gym didn't have their badges.
That came about seven years after I'd been stopped and frisked by two men who might or might not have been cops (They were in an unmarked van.) as I was riding my bike home from work on a hot day.
I don't know whether the stop-and-frisk incident had to do with my being trans: They claimed I was in the projects (which I wasn't, but "so what" if I were) and demanded to know what I was doing there. But I have little doubt that what happened during my second visit to the 114th had to do with my identity if for no other reason that I mentioned that fact about myself in all of my visits, as Dominick was using it to impute all of the old sterotypes to, in order to spread false rumors about, me.
As you can imagine, I've had no love (not that I had much before), and lost whatever respect I had for, the police until recently. The only reason why I am now willing to even entertain the idea of revising my opinion of them is that I've met a detective in my church who is nothing like I expected any officer to be. I think she really means it when she expresses her sorrow over my experience.
We need more like her. Even for those who, like her, became cops because they wanted "to help people" or "be a positive force in the community", understanding of people whose gender or sexual identities might be different from their own are developed. (The same is true of most people, I believe.)
That is why I am glad to see that the Department of Justice has just launched a program to train local police departments to better respond to transgender people. It is, if nothing else, a good first step: a recognition of a need.
Deputy Attorney General James Cole understands that one result of mistreatment is that too many of us simply don't report harassments, assaults or other violations against us. As a matter of fact, even after that third visit to the 114th, when an officer finally took a statement from me, I vowed to never again report any crime, against myself or anyone else, to the police. Maybe, just maybe, I'll reconsider.